Wednesday, January 6, 2010

WHO DEFINES WHAT A SMART PRESIDENT IS?

Tonight, moving around on channels, I heard Britt Hume on (Fox News) advising (in replay) Tiger Woods to convert to Christianity so that he can get absolution. The Hume went on to complain about the length of time it took Obama to do something about the Christmas Day plane bomber. Apparently a president has done nothing if the media hasn't been told so they can distort it all to the public and stir up some more upset, hate and fear.

The teabaggers have gone wild again. They have gone far beyond their right to free speech expressing opinions and are advocating, dangerously, death to the Democratic party, to Obama's goals, and when they burn Obama in effigy, I think they have gone to far in tour United States. The media says nothing about anything being done about it.

Quist is running to be a Congressman from Minnesota. He has mentored Michelle Bachman who also has his wife working for her. He admits to trying everything he can do to kill the HealthCare bill. Watch here if your stomach is strong. He accuses Obama, Pelosi and other democrats of being radicals, not liberals. He talks about doing team work but he is no team player. The team to be on is FOR the USA, not against it. He was not elected president. Obana was. I deeply resent the Republicans for not allowing Obama to do what he was elected to do and see many today as being treasonous and getting away with it.

On Countdown, one of his usually brighter guests said Obama didn't look smart in the way he handled Christmas Day bomber threat. What should he have done to look smart? Should he have done what stupid people want...play the blame game rather than focus on how to correct a present problem? Apparently he doesn't appear smart unless he continues to do that which people expect...all the things that have been done and didn't work.

No comments: