Any man who affects the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood.
-H.L. Mencken That statement seems to be true today as it was before he died in the 50s and spoke it. One of the disturbing facts of our times is that it differs when a man stood on a soap box in the village or city square and spoke without amplification. In today's world, the word of men and women is tweeted, networked, and distorted in is being repeated by the massive media systems. We have radio which can be heard everywhere, hand held technology that gives instant news, and even apps to inform us that raindrops are about to fall.
|
Ed Schultz |
|
Rachel Maddow |
Today we live in a world where we are subjected to the opinions of people who have no constructive ideas. As one show pointed out, about three times as many Republicans, most from the Bush administration, while only three Democrats, not especially close to the the killing of Osama bin Laden. were brought in to comment.
Ed Schultz and
Rachel Maddow both (MSNBC) questioned why the shows seem to be bringing on a lot of the Bush administration people. This was unclear to them as it is to me.
|
Christianne Amanpour |
|
David Gregory |
More importantly, I was a faithful viewer of This Week on ABC and admire
Christianne Amanpour but whether by her choice or that of the producer of the show, the past few shows have lacked news and meaning for me as has Meet the Press, though I also don't believe it is the fault of
David Gregory, either. Who chooses the guests? I'm afraid I have become a non-viewer on Sunday mornings though I cannot get desperate enough to think going to church would improve Sunday mornings.
Could we suggest better choices for guests and panelists in the future?
No comments:
Post a Comment