Despite all the Republican claims that there is not a war on women, we are getting clearer on where the misogyny really rests. Many assertions that 'real 'rapes don't produce pregnancies. They make no note of the violation to a woman of having the rapist's sperm in her womb whose . However, these misogynists definitely want to believe that the woman's body, by some process they do not understand,rejects the rapist's sperm. Ignorantly, they assume erroneously that all 'real' pregnancies stem out of the loving cooperation and coital union of a couple wanting to conceive. John C. Willke, M.D.in 1999 wrote this 'medical nonsense' which apparently many foolish and people of
faith' beloved him, The original's reprint can be read here.
The New York Times immediately wrote an article disclaiming the inaccurate medical information in that article. To read it, click here. Dr. Wilke, who wrote that it was rare for women to gt pregnant when raped, said the following recently, at his now age 87...(showing that he is not likely to be right up to date on this medical knowledge?)
"Dr. Willke, 87, asserted yesterday that “way under 1 percent” of rape victims become pregnant, not just because of female biology but because about half of rapists “do not deposit sperm in the vagina.” That, Dr. Willke said, is because many rapists have “a preference for rectal intercourse over vaginal”; experience “premature ejaculation, which is a major factor”; or “some of these guys just plain aren’t fertile.”
Non believers in science (which can be proven) drops to oblivion when faced with religious 'faith' (which cannot be proven) The leaders of the anti-abortion movement are not pro-life as they fail to help life after birth. They show their ignorance of a women's body and their hypocritical attempts to have women back to being barefoot and pregnant Is it a surprise that women who have borne children, raised them, and also had to leave them to enter the work force to help support the family cannot agree that they should have a smaller government while retaining one that tries to tell them what to do with the reproductive system?
.
faith' beloved him, The original's reprint can be read here.
The New York Times immediately wrote an article disclaiming the inaccurate medical information in that article. To read it, click here. Dr. Wilke, who wrote that it was rare for women to gt pregnant when raped, said the following recently, at his now age 87...(showing that he is not likely to be right up to date on this medical knowledge?)
"Dr. Willke, 87, asserted yesterday that “way under 1 percent” of rape victims become pregnant, not just because of female biology but because about half of rapists “do not deposit sperm in the vagina.” That, Dr. Willke said, is because many rapists have “a preference for rectal intercourse over vaginal”; experience “premature ejaculation, which is a major factor”; or “some of these guys just plain aren’t fertile.”
Non believers in science (which can be proven) drops to oblivion when faced with religious 'faith' (which cannot be proven) The leaders of the anti-abortion movement are not pro-life as they fail to help life after birth. They show their ignorance of a women's body and their hypocritical attempts to have women back to being barefoot and pregnant Is it a surprise that women who have borne children, raised them, and also had to leave them to enter the work force to help support the family cannot agree that they should have a smaller government while retaining one that tries to tell them what to do with the reproductive system?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment