Saturday, May 10, 2008
ONE OF THE REASONS THE USA LAGS BEHIND THE REST OF THE WORLD
In 2003, the US Congress passed a law to tighten domain names that were meant to mislead people into porn sites. I do believe that misleading people should be stopped. In March 2007, the law was quashed when the courts decided that it deprived too many people of the rights to free speech while attempting to protect the few.
A demonstration of the perversion of some of the government officials with regard to their priorities to keep the public safe; it was not terrorism, organized crime, narcotics trafficking, immigration, or public corruption it was! pornography. Is there any wonder that such clear evidence that those running the country the past few years are totally out of step with the real issues that confront us as adults trying to survive in the US today.
While I abhor mysogynistic and sadistic pornography on a personal level and do not feel a need to frequent pornographic sites (which many of my male friends report often drop little nasties on one's computer) I strongly support the right to it for those for whom it is as helpful as sitting in church listening to a Hell and Damnation sermon. I abhor that there are some self-defined righteous people who think they can dictate what others must think and feel.
Friday, May 9, 2008
NATURE'S OXYMORONS
A rare white (albino) blackbird is sighted in New Hampshire.
A giant shrimp in Texas.
A writer writes on urban biodiversity. This is where we find our oxymoron. It is not nature in the city...it is the city in Nature. We read: "Isn't "urban nature" an oxymoron? People live in cities! Nature is "in the country!" Factory farming, a newer coined industry seems rather an oxymoron to me.
Ward M. Clark writes that "Animal Rights" is an oxymoron.
Mary Chipman writes about 'responsible breeder' as an oxymoron. She stresses: "The "responsible breeder" says she is doing it for the love of the breed, for the opportunity to bring pleasure to prospective owners of the offspring, or for any number of superficially noble reasons. It really doesn't matter what the reasons are; the fact still remains that for every puppy or kitten born, there is one less chance that an animal who already exists is going to find a home. Like it or not, millions of perfectly healthy and beautiful dogs and cats are euthanized in American shelters every single year to make room for the next wave. There are only so many potential homes. As the saying goes, you do the math."
Now all of this may be the 'exact opposite' of what we may have imagined. It is a 'known secret' that Nature is full of surprises and incongruities. What I wrote may be 'old news' to you, the reade, but I 'almost never' had more fun compiling oxymorons.
Thursday, May 8, 2008
OUR HYPOCRITICAL GOVERNMENT
The article linked, should you not have time to read it all, says: "In the U.S., where roughly two-fifths of troops returning from combat deployments are presenting serious mental health problems, PTSD has gone political in form of the Psychological Kevlar Act, which would direct the Secretary of Defense to implement "preventive and early-intervention measures" to protect troops against "stress-related psychopathologies."
Pilots, I have read, are frequently given amphetamines due to the many hours they must stay awake. Soldiers are often given the same. It is stretching my imagination to believe that there are physicians who thoroughly examine the total medical history of the servicemen, in battle and at war, to whom they prescribe as desirable candidates of the drug for the betterment of their own health. Wikepedia does not report a picture to support the good of it.
"Physical effects
- Short-term physiological effects vary greatly, depending on dosage used and the method in which the drug is taken. At therapeutic levels, the most common effects are decreased appetite, increased stamina, and physical energy.[citation needed]
- Abuse or overdose effects[citation needed] can include tremor, restlessness, changed sleep patterns, anxiety hyperhidrosis, psychomotor agitation, nausea, tachycardia, irregular heart rate, hypertension, headaches, hyperreflexia, tachypnea, gastrointestinal narrowing, and weakened immune system and increase in pre-existing anxiety and poor skin condition.[citation needed] Fatigue and depression can follow the excitement stage. Erectile dysfunction, heart problems, stroke, and liver, kidney and lung damage can result from prolonged abuse.[citation needed] When insufflated, amphetamine can lead to a deterioration of the lining of the nostrils.[citation needed] Overdose can be treated with chlorpromazine.[12]
Psychological effects
- Short-term psychological effects of the drug at therapeutic levels could include alertness, euphoria, increased concentration, rapid talking, increased confidence, and increased social responsiveness.[citation needed] Effects of the drug when abused could include, hallucinations, and loss of REM sleep the night after use.[citation needed]
- Long-term amphetamine abuse can induce psychological effects that include insomnia, mental states resembling schizophrenia, aggressiveness (not associated with schizophrenia), addiction or dependence with accompanying withdrawal symptoms, irritability, confusion, and panic.[citation needed] Chronic and/or extensively-continuous use can lead to amphetamine psychosis, which causes delusions and paranoia, but this is uncommon when taken as prescribed. The abuse of an amphetamine is highly addictive, and, with chronic abuse, tolerance develops very quickly. Withdrawal, although not physiologically threatening, is an unpleasant experience (including paranoia, depression, difficult breathing, dysphoria, gastric fluctuations and/or pain, and lethargia).[citation needed] This commonly leads chronic users to re-dose amphetamine frequently, explaining tolerance and increasing the possibility of addiction.
Dependence & Addiction
Tolerance is developed rapidly in amphetamine abuse, therefore increasing the amount of the drug that is needed to satisfy the addiction.[13] Repeated amphetamine use can produce "reverse tolerance", or sensitization to some psychological effects.[14][15][16][17][18] Many abusers will repeat the amphetamine cycle by taking more of the drug during the withdrawal. This leads to a very dangerous cycle and may involve the use of other drugs to get over the withdrawal process. Abusers will commonly stay up for 2 or 3 days avoiding the withdrawals then dose themselves with benzodiazepines or barbiturates to help them stay calm while they recuperate. The constant switching from uppers to downers can cause serious damage to the CNS and brain[citation needed]. Chronic abusers of amphetamines typically snort or resort to drug injection to experience the full effects of the drug in a faster and more intense way, with the added risks of infection, vein damage, and higher risk of overdose. Because of the abuse of amphetamines in the U.S., most brands were discontinued by the 1990s, including the highly abused brand names Biphetamine (known as "black beauties") and Preludin, known on the street as "slams", whose coating was peeled and then injected. Only a few brands of amphetamines are still produced in the United States: those prescribed for narcolepsy, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment-resistant depression, and extreme obesity.[citation needed]"
Proponents of the "Psychological Kevlar" approach to PTSD may have found a silver bullet in the form of propranolol, a 50-year-old beta-blocker used on-label to treat high blood pressure, and off-label as a stress-buster for performers and exam-takers. Ongoing psychiatric research has intriguingly suggested that a dose of propranolol, taken soon after a harrowing event, can suppress the victim's stress response and effectively block the physiological process that makes certain memories intense and intrusive. That the drug is cheap and well tolerated is icing on the cake."
"10/31/06 (2006-10-31) Army specialist Alyssa Peterson was an Arabic speaking interrogator assigned to the prison at the Tal-afar airbase in far northwestern Iraq near the Syrian border. According to the Army's investigation into her death, obtained by a KNAU reporter through the Freedom of Information Act, Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners. She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all records of those techniques have now been destroyed.
Instead she was assigned to the base gate, where she monitored Iraqi guards. She was sent to suicide prevention training. But on the night of September 15th, 2003, Army investigators concluded she shot and killed herself with her service rifle. [KNAU]"
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
OBAMA VICTORY SPEECH IN NORTH CAROLINA
While I think Democrats have fallen for Limbaugh's (and other Republican voices) continuing to say "Don't throw me in the briar patch" (if anyone remembers their old children's stories about Br'er Rabbit, it is fortunate for the country that we have two superb candidates. If the news media was as qualified for their jobs as the two Democratic candidates are for goals, our country would be more fairly informed and served by them. However, they have sold out to their masters who hold their paychecks, sadly.
Senator Clinton gave a victory speech in Indiana for herself. While the media was planning her political funeral, she continued with her message of hope for our country under her leadership.
Both of these candidates are asking us to start acting like Americans again. Chris Matthews called her speech a 'charming' speech, then added, "Perhaps she has a new speech writer." He forgets that both of these candidates can talk for themselves, even with speech writers which we know is doubtful with our current leader. Olbermann saw it as 'like one of those Schwartzernegger movies in which the machine gets an arm cut off and then comes back to life."
He doesn't mention that he and his media accomplices cut off the arm!
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
WHAT'S IN A NAME?
The third commandment is is usually understood as a prohibition against using God's name in profanity or even in a callous manner. ""You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name." Two states are suing over illegal use of Legal Aid.
For those who take the right to free speech too literally...nothing in life is totally free.
|
Sunday, May 4, 2008
FOR JANE AUSTEN LOVERS
Aston writes well. After the first that I read by her on the Darcy clan, she did a much better job at building her characters. However, one thing I noted (though she relies heavily on the format that Austen used) is that she has peppered her books with villains while Austen only used mean spirited characters. While there is one who might be called a villain, he was simply selfish and not really as determined to do the kind of evil Aston writes about in some of her characters. There are intrigues, misunderstandings, but less of the detail with which Austen described went through the heads of her characters. Nevertheless, Aston's books still qualify beautifully in the 'feel-good' category of books for readers who like to leave the last page with a nice warm feeling that the world is not such a bad place, after all.
LACK OF CLARITY IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Words can be so much fun. For example, there's sewer and sewer. What, might you ask is the difference? Well Betsy Ross was one and the other is a mass of pipes carrying doo-doo away. Now how would someone new to our language figure that out? Newspapers are even more difficult for strangers to English. I remember a journalist saying that the soldier yelled, "Drop your arms and raise your hands" That might seen very difficult to do!
Headlines make great use of the language with two meanings as in: 'Patient At Death's Door--Doctors Pull Him Through'.
Humor is based on using language literally. Rodney Dangerfield used to say, simply, "Take my wife...please!" People are so frequently apologetic so repeatedly as to make it most annoying. It is as though they can never take responsibility for anything they have done. They try to get out of responsibility by saying, "I'm really trying!" a prompt answer most usually is, "Yes, you are....VERY!"
Very confusing are missed punctuation marks. An early sentence to illustrate this used to be: 'The cow fell in the hole on her back' suggestion of implosion rather than , 'The cow fell in the hole, on her back.'
People play with matching sounds: "He believed Caesar could see people seizing the seas."
We also have words whose definitions are both synonyms and antonyms: cleave (adhere and separate); cover (conceal and expose); trim (garnish and prune); sanction (censure and approve). Is there any wonder why we, as a people, have difficulty understanding one another?