Showing posts with label Dick Cheney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dick Cheney. Show all posts

Friday, August 26, 2011

THE MAJOR PREACHER OF DIVISIVENESS IN OUR COUNTRY!

Dick Cheney
It is tragic that many of the candidates for public office are too young to remember what it felt like to be united against a common enemy in time of war and be proud of our own country.  We lost that during the Viet Nam War and never regained it, only to lose it more acutely under the Bush-Cheney administration.  Apparently the man who as Vice-President, Cheney, has written a book, claiming that heads will explode in Washington when it is read.  Truth does not usually explode people's heads so I wonder just what he has written.  His narcissism seems present when he says his book makes no apologies for any of the illegal positions he took during his tenure in office.


He writes: In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir  Next to it on the Amazon page is:  Cheney: The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President by Stephen F. Hayes.

John Nichols wrote: Dick: The Man Who is President (Dick Cheney.  There were many books about the controversial man acting as President though not elected to that office, simply because the elected President was too weak to stop him.  That inability to stop Cheney will forever be borne as a negative to the GW Bush presidential history.

In a recent NY Times article by Charlie Savage, he writes that Cheney had urged Bush to bomb Syria in 2007  Click here to read the article.  The article quotes: 
“I again made the case for U.S. military action against the reactor,” Mr. Cheney wrote about a meeting on the issue. “But I was a lone voice. After I finished, the president asked, ‘Does anyone here agree with the vice president?’ Not a single hand went up around the room.”

For one, I will not bother to read his book as it would be against my integrity to give the man money for the terrible things he did to this country.  I know that the media, both TV and print, will review it more than sufficiently for me to know and confirm my opinion that he should be prosecuted for what he did to damage the image of our country.  However, since he can't travel to Europe for fear of prosecution for his war crimes, I clearly do not stand alone in this opinion. 

Monday, February 15, 2010

MEDIA IS BLATANTLY TRYING TO START A FEUD


While ABC's This Week featured the Bush VP, Dick Cheney, Meet the Press on NBC followed with Joe Biden, the current VP. Though they appeared on two different channels, NBC headlined on their site: "Joe Biden Tears Into Dick Cheney on Meet the Press" That was an interesting way to put it since Cheney was on This Week earlier than Biden. I would strongly urge the reader to check out this site, where you can watch all the videos discussing this today.

One commentator called it an unprecedented attack on Cheney! Biden was tactful, a gentleman throughout and only spoke the truth. If one would take the time to listen to all the video clips on this site, you will see the twisting (worse than the old parlor game of telephone) so that there is no longer an honest description of what was said by Biden. In fact, some of what he had said was cut out in one of the write-ups which indicated some pretty biased editing to me. As David Gregory worked to get Biden to blast back, Biden did not. He tactfully said that "Cheney is entitled to his opinion. He is not entitled to rewrite history. He is not entitled to his own 'facts'."

Cheney used the word 'credit' to the Obama administration for its current action in Afghanistan. Biden said he did not think they should be given 'credit', but that it was their 'responsibility'. Cheney wants waterboarding back in and Biden says no. Biden said Cheney was factually and substantively wrong. He questioned that he was either misinformed or uniformed. My own view is that neither is true...he just lies to say what suits him and will misinform the public who might be uninformed to that point...or Cheney sees the truth as misinformation since it is not what he wants people to think.

It is fascinating to see just how far the media will go to twist words and meanings and try to get a fight going. Both men have a history of losing their tempers and saying things they might later have regretted. Is that really what interviewers should be trying to have happen just for ratings? Whatever happened to journalists who wanted to help bring the truth before the citizen's eyes and help this democracy work like one? Shame on David Gregory. Tim Russert must be turning over in his grave.

Friday, October 3, 2008

BIDEN-PALIN DEBATE


Despite the apparent wish of the media to see more action or a TKO, the debate was somewhat benign and predictable. In my opinion, Biden won hands-down. However, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder and those willing to assume charm is worth more than substance saw it differently than I did. Biden smiled a beautiful, white, toothful smile at some of Palins remarks and attacks but only spoke to correct the inaccuracy of some of Palin's reflections on the Obama positions.

Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, saw Palin realistically while Pat Buchanan, MSNBC, thought Palin did a wonderful job and won the debate. He could hardly stop raving about it. Rachel Maddow seemed to get it right when she said you could choose Biden (boring and right) or Palin (exciting and wrong). Catty Kay on the BBC thought that McCain needed more tonight from Palin than charm. She added that, because of the way the poll numbers are running currently, this might not have gone well for McCain. The woman rarely answered the question that was asked, often changed the subject to refer back to something she was more comfortable answering, usually to say what she had done as Mayor of that tiny town or as Governor of the 600,00+ people of that 'big state' of Alaska. She totally lacked substance in her answers. David Gregory, MSNBC, thought Palin had a game plan to which she stuck but did not add that she was particularly successful. Chris Matthews took issue with her saying she thought the powers of the Vice President should be expanded and read her as not planning to play by the rules. CNN offered focus group's responses which seemed to be a strong preference for Obama. One woman, who I had understood to be an independent going in, decided she liked what Palin had to say. The woman looked like a deer caught in the headlights, spoke slowly and seemed to have difficulty getting out her thoughts, so I was not clear on what part of Palin's responses she was using to change or solidy her vote.

Biden offered much historical data and did not bite at Palin's attempts to unseat him with her homespun darts. Her cutesy, raised voice at the beginning, asking if she could call Biden Joe, started her attempt to convince everyone that she, more than Biden, would be for six-pack Joe and middle America. However, on the substantive issues, she follows McCain who follows Bush.
Biden defined the job of the VP as one in which he follows the lead of the President and acts as an adviser, influencing the Legislature only when a tie needs to be broken. Palin expressed that she would be more engaged with the Legislature, seeming not to understand the Constitution on this matter any more than Cheney had, with Bush allowing himself to be led by the nose by 'Big Dick'.

Palin, at one point, said she did not have to compromise much and did not care who got credit in her state. (She is obviously able to speak constantly of all she has done as Mayor and, later, Governor). Biden quoted Mike Mansfield, an early mentor to him. Mansfield taught him to never question motive, only judgments. Biden matched Palin emotionally about single parenting, sadness, and losses which Palin glossed over with no hint of empathy then tried to make her own unrelated point.

To me, Biden answered questions quickly, concisely, and did not play games. Palin skirted answering the questions, chose to make her own political speech instead, and never answered a question as to how McCain would effect change. She only expressed where she thought change was needed. She spouted the Bush/McCain party line throughout and I saw eight more years of Bush policym if she and MCain get to the White House, with panic in my heart.