Wednesday, September 12, 2012

THOSE WHO WOULD VOTE FOR ROMNEY: WHAT ARE THEY VOTING FOR WHEN HE HAS SAID NOTHING

Romney remains a master at obfuscation.  Lawrence O'Donnell calls them 'Romney words'. A person could be quite confused trying to follo9w Romney's responses.  He says what he thinks people want to hear and withholds that which he doesn't want people to hear.  Is this really the man want as President. It would be like being taken from your parents and sent to a foster home with a bad reputation.

Even the Wall Street Journal, a Murdoch (Republican holding) even writes on Romney.  Dylan Byers writes  "
Less than two months out from the November election, the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board still hasn't warmed on Mitt Romney.
Today, the WSJ board slams Romney for being too light on details regarding health care policy, a question that tripped him up during a recent interview with NBC's Meet The Press: "Mr. Romney's pre-existing political calculation seems to be that he can win the election without having to explain the economic moment or even his own policies," they write. "As this flap shows, such vagueness carries its own political risks." ".

One might think that when your own party is asking to give up some positive ideas for the future, you might respond.  However, an empty container has nothing to give up.

No comments: