Showing posts with label Stepford Wives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stepford Wives. Show all posts

Thursday, July 28, 2011

MICELELE BACHMANN: IS SHE A STEPFORD WIFE?

As I have watched Bachmann speak, her face is quite expressionless and her tone often a monotone.  After listening to her husband (a psychologist on prejudicial  steroids) speak, all I can picture are the Stepford Wives.

Her speeches, as they are repeated by the media over and over, sound so robotic.  I itch to remove her batteries or de-mesmerize her.  She says the same things, lies, and hypocrisies and contradictions over and over.

The very thought that she might be President of anything makes me shudder.  I shudder worse when I think there are others who think as she does.  Our world was a far better place when people were more challenging of the people they elected.

I reiterate what I have often said, "All candidates ought to be given a written test for their competency to serve as Legislators and especially as President.  Bachmann has verbally flunked the test in economics, Constitutional law, foreign policy, biology, and humanity.  Goddess help us!.

Monday, February 11, 2008

WHY THE WORLD FOR WOMEN CHANGES SLOWLY

In one common experiment, the Goldberg Paradigm, people are asked to evaluate a particular article or speech, supposedly by a man. Others are asked to evaluate the identical presentation, but from a woman. Typically, in countries all over the world, the very same words are rated higher coming from a man. Since the provocative findings of an early study by Goldberg (1968), researchers have addressed the possibility that evaluations of others and their work may be prejudicial against women. Goldberg obtained evidence which appeared to indicate that raters of a series of articles (attributed to male or female authors) showed a degree of bias against the work of females. Goldberg's subjects were female students, and Goldberg's conclusion was that females are prejudiced against other females.

In most states, polls show Hillary Clinton ahead of Barack Obama among voters making $50,000 a year or less -- many of whom say the economy is their top concern. Yes, the New York senator who appeared on the cover of Fortune magazine as Big Business's candidate is winning economically insecure, lower-income communities over the Illinois senator who grew up as an organizer helping those communities combat unemployment. This absurd phenomenon is a product of both message and bias.

Cenk Uygur of the Young Turks has a lot of fun with the clip featuring progressive writer Naomi Wolf and Fox News anchorman Shepard Smith. Shepard Smith talks over her, points a finger and says, "Don't go Fox on me!" There were then, on TYT, jokes made about the newscasters on Fox not giving news but giving propaganda and how frightened they would be to have to go look for another job which would actually require them to find and present actual truth and news.

Women are still underpaid in comparison to men. A recent study on ABC suggested the bias which exists against women being hired. Men and women being asked the same questions and giving the same answers were perceived differently.

It was very gratifying to see that MSNBC suspended David Shuster from further broadcasting because of his perjorative remark about Chelsea Clinton. While I did not read the NY Times chastising of Chris Matthews for his biased statements against Hillary Clinton, I understand that there was one. It is about time the media polices its own for perpetuating biases against women and, all I can say is, shame on the women who allow it and help keep it going out of their own fear that they will somehow be different if they are seen as equal and different from men. Remember, in the Stepford Wives, it was a women who turned all of them into robots, not a man! In A Knight's Tale, Rufus Sewell equates women to cattle. The brotherhood of men should be ashamed that their view of women has evolved so little in several centuries.