If people think one Republican is just like another Republican, they would be very much mistaken. In Delaware Christine O'Donnell is not seen as preferred candidate nor felt that she has a better chance of winning the election than her opponent. If you are having difficulties understanding the platform on which the
Teapartiers stand, you are not alone. The contradictions are mind boggling. While fighting to make the government less intrusive and smaller in our lives, Christine O'Donnell wants the government to force females as young as 13, who are raped by strangers or incestuously, to bear the children as a result of those rapes.
Christine O'Donnell seems, by all I have searched on her, to violate the Constitution with her goals. Wikipedia on O'Donnell says: "O'Donnell also served as a spokesperson for Concerned Women for America, a Conservative Christian political action group which seeks to apply biblical principles to issues of public policy." I do not believe our Constitution has yet been amended to allow Christianity to rule the country.
Karl Rove finally was forced by the party to endorse O'Donnell but it doesn't erase his previous statements that she was an embarrassment to the party and was not likely to win. It seems to me that as long as the Teapartiers seemed 'against' the Democrats, it was missed that they were associated as being with' Republicans. Voters in Arizona should also be advised that Sharron Angle is a disciple of Phyllis Schlafly. When did we lose our sanity and our country?
No comments:
Post a Comment