Showing posts with label Sean Hannity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean Hannity. Show all posts

Friday, January 14, 2011

NEWS IN TODAY'S WORLD

Americans continue to die in two wars in the Arab world, one inherited and the other drawn into by American greed.carried out by politicians' lies.  It seems the media chooses to focus on certain stories while ignoring  the spectacular rather than the necessary and interesting.  For years I've observed news people shove a microphone into  the face of a totally devastated mourner, tears streaming down their face, and ask, "Can you tell us what you are feeling now?"

Imagine that we should see as the leading news story on the BBC Americas page,  the funeral of the 9 year old killed in Tucson.  It is sad that it takes the inevitable and predicted deaths of innocents to confront deaf ears of the guilty that the right to free speech requires some use of common sense.  Hate rhetoric, TV, computer games, etc have done little to make a peace-loving new generation.  As in free software, after a trial period you have to buy the software to be able to run the program.  Similarly, in order to be accepted in the 'club', you have to prove yourself through your speeches and words. 

Sarah Palin has proven herself to be beautiful but somewhat brain dead in sensitivity to most of the people in the lower '48'. Ethics and morals are strangers to far too many. She may defend her right to free speech but she is yelling 'fire' in a movie theater.  I do not 'blame' her for the shooting. I have observed Michele Bachmann making no comments in the past few days, Glenn Beck making the kindest speech I have ever heard him make about toning down the hate speech, Palin whose writer didn't look far enough down the list of meanings of 'blood libel' to use a different phrase defended her poor choice.  I've learned that there are people who don't wish you to explain your meaning.  They know the words you used and that is all they wish to know.  The right choice of words distinguishes the great statesmen from the unsuccessful ones.  Sarah Palin failed that round.

Rand Paul on Hannity speaks of 'they' and what 'they ' have to do.  That vague  
they' allows him to continue to talk about the ideal without any real way of knowing what has to be done to get there other than his suggestion of needing new leadership in Washington, obviously forgetting that it what we voted in two years ago to undo what the Bush administration did to our economics.  Rand Paul has zeal but lacks experience to see ahead to political consequences.  I don't mean about his own re-election, I mean the results to our countrymen if his policies are enacted.

Friday, August 14, 2009

GET ENTERTAINMENT RATINGS OUT OF THE NEWS SHOWS

We have Oscars and Emmys and lots of other awards for the best of a category. Perhaps someone should set up a new contest to incorporate the news media since it has now fully slipped into an entertainment category.

As long as we now have Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Palin, Malkin, and I could just go on and on, we have the greatest lot of prevaricators as to what is going on in the world. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are the only two who admit they are comedians though many of us get a far better picture of reality from them than the aforementioned.

It is pitiful that our news media has allowed itself to be in bondage to ratings rather than truth. If you need to find out whether you are a good judge of ethics, morality, veracity, admirable modeling...know that you are not a good judge if you enjoy any of those listed above. It is unlikely that you will agree with me if you see that this is truthful about you, but it doesn't make it less applicable whether you agree or not.

We need to resurrect the old newsroom cast, with crushed felt hats, cigars or cigarettes hanging from the mouth, and the guts to print the truth.

Sarah Palin, who is not openly running for office and yet has never stopped campaigning as though she were, is talking as though she expects people to believe her.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

ODDS AND TIDBITS: MORE ON ABUSE OF FREE SPEECH

Bill O'Reilly, Sexist and Proud of It Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Films at 3:00 PM on May 7, 2009. It will always puzzle me how so many people are unable to see through the lies and nastiness that people like Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage, among others, get rich on while poor people stay poor and misinformed by listening to them. Limbaugh can enjoy his 24,000 sq foot house while he makes the common man's life more of a problem, having done so much to support the terrible choices the past Administration made in the last eight years.

Another One Bites the Dust: Joe the Plumber Is Quitting the GOP Posted by Staff, Huffington Post at 11:12 AM on May 7, 2009. Time Magazine is reporting - burying rather - the news that Joe the Plumber, also known as Samuel Wurzelbacher, is quitting the GOP.

The Secret Right-Wing Strategy on Health Care—Exposed! Posted by Bernie Horn at 10:13 AM on May 7, 2009. If conservatives make the debate about what is good and bad in the Obama plan - they will win.

While Cheney goes around bragging that we have not had a terrorist attack since he and Bush used torture and kept us all safe. Well, I for onr, do not consider us safe at all. We may have not been attacked from the outside, but the dangers within the country still persist. When a sports announcer talks about about shooting Nancy Pelosi twice and strangling Harry Reid and Osama ben Laden, Olbermann's term 'abuse of free speech' says it all for me.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

THE TWO FACES OF FREE SPEECH

Free speech is important in our democracy yet there are boundaries to everything. We have already adopted the rule (law?) that you may no longer falsely yell fire in a crowded theater. I know little of laws that aren't beaten into us daily, like not going through a red light, not cheating on income taxes, not breaking and entering, stealing and all those obvious to us through daily living. However, it is less clear to me what we do with radical media who are inciting revolution, death to Obama, overthrow of the government they believe is fearful to their beliefs, even plan revolution.

Max Blumenthal wrote for the Daily Beast on 5/1/09 "Armed Revolt in the Obama Era? Right-Wing Gun Nuts Share Their Paranoid Worldview. Read his highlighted report and you will see immediately the 'slippery slope' thinking that is being fostered by a few hateful media gurus making money off spreading lies and fear.

Is it not time that the FCC, or some agency which can legally monitor these public broadcasts, do something about the actual lies being spread? MoveOn.org is calling for impeachment of Judge Bybee. His crime is interpreting too freely the use of torture. One has to ask the question 'where does misinterpretation of laws and outright lying begin and end?'.

Sean Hannity on radio:: "On the March 18 broadcast of his radio show, Sean Hannity blamed congressional Democrats for the AIG bonuses, falsely asserting that they voted for the bonuses when they voted for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Hannity stated, "Now, if you're upset about this, you need to understand something, that there's a reason this happened. Every single Senate Democrat voted for those bonuses. Every -- almost every Democrat in the House voted for those, because they voted for the stimulus bill. And by the way, Republicans did not." In fact, as Media Matters for America has documented, the economic recovery act did not require that AIG pay bonuses. Rather, the relevant provision in the act, which was based on an amendment by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), restricted the ability of companies receiving money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to award bonuses in the future."

The American Politics Journal reports on Rush Limbaugh's 20 years of lies and hate. I see that there is a strong line to be drawn between the right to freely express an opinion and calling disciples to illegal action. At the height of the war against abortion, there was a call to kill doctors performing them. The doctors houses were picketed and families and children suffered greatly. Something is wrong with that picture. The group even killed some doctors in the name of saving lives!! It goes beyond the ability to express, verbally, an opinion when innocent people are killed.

We have heard for a long time that there are armed militia ready to revolt. Is this what we wish to develop, American citizen terrorists killing our own people?

Monday, April 21, 2008

MEN WITH SMALL, JOURNALIST COHONES

Eric Boehlert wrote on Chris Matthews for Media Matters for America. His historic overview validated the feelings many of us have about the man towards whom former admiration has turned to complete dislike and disrespect. When he used to have Mike Barnicle replace him, or as a guest, I thought it was only Barnicle who was misogynistic. However, it is clear that they both are so. Boehlert reminds us that is was Matthews quoted in the Boehlert article: "It's just that the Times politely chose to ignore them. So readers still probably have no idea that Matthews:
  • featured a Photoshopped image of Clinton sporting "She Devil" horns while discussing Republican efforts to demonize her;
  • repeatedly likened Clinton to "Nurse Ratched," the scheming, heartless character from the mental hospital drama One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest;
  • referred to Clinton as "Madame Defarge" and described male politicians who endorsed Clinton as "castratos in the eunuch chorus";
  • compared Clinton to a "strip-teaser," wondered whether she was "a convincing mom," referred to Clinton's "cold eyes" and the "cold look" she supposedly gives people;
  • claimed that "some men" say Clinton's voice sounds like "fingernails on a blackboard."
Nothing like that has been said about any of the Republican women. Instead he has done nothing but praise Kay Bailey Hutchinson, whom I hear as an echo to Republican policies for the past eight years. Does that suggest that only Democrat women are frightening because they have original thoughts, because they are not frightened and cow-towing to the men, because they are strong enough to withstand the demeaning and lying comments made by the men?

Long enough ago that most voters today would not remember, Freud used to describe all women as having 'penis envy'. The poor Victorian man was quite mistaken and feminists wrote that it was not 'penis envy' but 'penis pity', a concept that only resulted in pornography growing in sales with video being easy to market, and later through the Internet, of men getting their jollies by watching women being totally subjugated and demeaned in front of their eyes. It obviously served as sublimation to the shaky sense of masculinity in so many men who feared dealing with women gaining ground in voice and actions.
Domestic violence against women is a disturbingly common occurrence in the United States. There are still cultural factors at work as immigrants from less modern countries arrive here with less advanced views on equality of women.

Behavior therapy introduced a focus on the difference between assertiveness and aggressiveness. However, success of women blinds many men to that differentiation. Any woman with a strong voice and action is seen as aggressive, while many men continue under the delusion that women are their chattel, though the law changed that status many decades ago. Remnants of the male struggle to hold onto that position is evident in what the predominantly male law enforcers have ignored for a hundred years here in the United States. The condescension in their notion that women are invited into Heaven by their satisfied husbands is evident in their misogynistic community.

Phyllis Schlafly led an conflicted movement to prevent the Equal Rights Amendment. She wanted women to hold onto their traditional roles and be a stay-at-home-Moms to raise their children. Men seemed to want that as well but the economy became such that many women found it necessary to work outside the home. Men still wanted the status quo and do nothing but go to work, come home to a cooked meal, do no housework, have little responsibility for child care, and the wives, working a full-time job outside the home, do everything else they had always done. For those kind husbands who assisted, it was said they 'helped' their wives with the wife's work. Young couples of today might find that either sad or amusing, since couples have evolved to a much more shared responsibility in their marriage partnership and childrearing.

Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and all the other misogynists who control the airwaves are a dying breed. They will soon find out that the media might still be controlled as the masses don't have the time to spend to search for the truth, but it will reach them through satire, cartoons, comic strips, and comedy. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, the writers of South Park, and others are reaching a larger audience than the major 'news' channels and are far more trustworthy and believable because they usually demonstrate with actual video clips, previously aired by traditional media, the lies politicians are telling and later recounting and waffling about.

Hopefully, in a few years these 'journalists' will stop saying they 'love' women just as they might say they' love' their pets.